Support for the Indonesian Government on the Pilkada Law Amendment: Towards a More Open and Inclusive Democracy

Currently, the Indonesian public is abuzz with discussions about the viral spread of the 1991 emergency announcement, which is related to a major amendment to Law No. 10 on the Election of Governors, Mayors, and Regional Representatives, commonly known as the Pilkada Law. This amendment is the result of Constitutional Court Decision No. 60/PUU-XXII/2024, which was initiated by the Labor Party and the Gelora Party through a legal case.

Before this amendment, the requirements to run for regional head were very strict. Political parties or coalitions wishing to nominate candidates had to have 20% of the seats in the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) or obtain at least 25% of the total votes in winning DPRD seats, as stipulated in Article 40 Paragraph (1) of the Regional Election Law. This condition often limited the participation of candidates desired by the people and was more influenced by elite political interests.

However, with this new amendment, the requirements have become more inclusive and democratic. Now, political parties or independent candidates only need to secure 7.5% of the total votes in the 2024 DPRD Election to be eligible to run for regional head, including the Governor and Deputy Governor of Jakarta. This change opens up greater opportunities for previously marginalized candidates, including those closer to the aspirations of the people.

This decision is indeed surprising in the context of Indonesian politics but brings a breath of fresh air to our democracy. The Indonesian public welcomes this change as it means more independent candidates can compete in Pilkada, offering a broader and more representative choice for the people. This is a significant step towards a more open democracy, where the people have greater freedom in choosing their leaders.

The protests occurring today should be understood as a signal from the people to the House of Representatives (DPR) not to oppose this decision. Opposing this amendment would be tantamount to opposing democracy, as we would return to a situation where the people's choices are limited to candidates supported by political elites. Now, with this change, our democracy becomes more inclusive, allowing every vote to count and every candidate, whether from a large or small political party, to have an equal opportunity.

Before this amendment, there were only two pairs expected to compete in the Pilkada, namely Ridwan Kamil-Susono from the Indonesia Maju Coalition (KIM Plus) and Dharma Pongrekun-Kun Wardana who are running independently. However, with this more open regulation, we may see a more balanced and fair political contest at the regional level, which will undoubtedly bring great benefits to the development of democracy in Indonesia.

In the end, this amendment represents a significant milestone for Indonesian politics. By supporting this move, we are supporting a healthier, more open, and more inclusive democracy, where the people's voices are truly heard and valued.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Visi dan Misi serta Schedule PW IPM Sulsel Periode 2014 - 2016

Orang yang dicintai Allah SWT

... KISAH MENGHARUKAN, KETULUSAN CINTA SEORANG SUAMI ...